Off Road Tires Appear Exempt: California's rolling resistance requirements that take effect in 2029 and further tighten in 2033

Dgchurch23

Active member
🏆 BR of the Month 🏆
Joined
Nov 28, 2024
Messages
93
Gallery
35
Reaction score
169
Location
Elk Grove
Current Ride
Bronco Raptor
A quick set of AI search results:

Last two paragraphs of the PR announcement:


"The CEC also conducted a five-year stakeholder engagement process with the tire industry, including manufacturers and trade associations. Based on feedback from stakeholders, the CEC has carved out exceptions for certain specialty tires, such as competition tires, large off-road tires, and all-weather winter performance tires. It also created product categories for long-life tires, ultra-high-performance tires, low-load-index tires, and other tires with special characteristics.

As the CEC implements the replacement tire efficiency standard, it will continue to work with stakeholders and ensure equitable and effective enforcement."


---------------------------------------
The exemptions for off-road and specialty tires are documented explicitly in the official regulatory text, program proceedings, and formal adoption announcements issued by the California Energy Commission (CEC). [1, 2]
The specific documentation proving these exemptions exists across a few official layers:

1. The CEC Replacement Tire Efficiency Program Proceeding​

The formal regulatory text developed under the CEC Replacement Tire Efficiency Program Proceeding explicitly outlines which categories are excluded from meeting the minimum performance standards. According to the program’s governing documents, the following categories are legally excluded from the 9.1 N/kN rolling-resistance threshold: [2, 3]


  • Deep tread tires (which covers typical off-road and mud-terrain tires)
  • Large off-road tires designed for use up to 99 mph
  • Tires designed for ATVs and other off-road vehicles
  • Winter-type snow tires and all-season winter performance tires
  • High load index tires (rated 122 or greater, often used on heavy-duty commercial or towing trucks)
  • Competition tires designed strictly for motorsports [2, 3, 4]

2. Official CEC Adoption Announcement​

Following the unanimous vote to pass the standards, the CEC Official Press Release formally stated that the agency intentionally carved out these exceptions based on a five-year stakeholder engagement process with the tire industry. The document confirms these exemptions were made to prevent adverse tradeoffs with tire traction, safety, and specialized vehicle utility. [1, 5]

3. Historical Statutory Authority (Assembly Bill 844)​

The foundation for this entire regulation stems from California Assembly Bill 844, a law passed that mandated the CEC to implement a tire efficiency program. The framework of AB 844 explicitly requires the commission to ensure that any new energy standards do not adversely affect tire safety or tread life, which provided the legal basis for stakeholders to secure exemptions for deep-tread off-road and winter tires that inherently require higher rolling resistance to perform safely. [4, 5]
If you are looking to read the exact legal language or check updates on compliance testing, you can review the public docket on the California Energy Commission Proceeding Page. [2]
Would you like help finding the exact technical definitions the CEC uses to classify a tire as a "deep tread" or "large off-road" tire?

[1] https://www.energy.ca.gov
[2] https://www.energy.ca.gov
[3] https://www.kcra.com
[4] https://www.foxbusiness.com
[5] https://www.energy.ca.gov
 
BANNED! I’ve reported you (@Dgchurch) to the California Department of Tire Efficiency.

Your fancy new 39” K03s don’t qualify on tread depth or large off-road tire (speed rating) exemptions.

I know that you’ll be removing those this morning based on your demonstrated strict adherence to all rules, regulations and social norms.

UPDATE: The stock KO2s won’t qualify either. Looks like the Bronco Raptor is dead in California. 😳
 
Just the fact that this was entertained is just lunacy. But, not surprised of anything coming from California. Tire companies have DEEP pockets and they will lobby against, it if it hurts their profits any. I really don't think this will stay. I say we open a tire shop on the NV border and get rich. hahahaha
 
Just the fact that this was entertained is just lunacy. But, not surprised of anything coming from California. Tire companies have DEEP pockets and they will lobby against, it if it hurts their profits any. I really don't think this will stay. I say we open a tire shop on the NV border and get rich. hahahaha
bordertown or boomtown... are we doing vegas or reno? we'll be billionaires!!!!
 
Already working on a chain of John Galt’s (a remarkably ironic name choice for this issue) Tires and Tables. Reno, Carson City and Primm (Vegas)

CE230378-A437-4CC7-9E76-E9374104E4C1.webp
 
Ahhhhh ya! A chain tire business. I have Primm. The gambling machines alone will get us all rich. Lol!
 
Just the fact that this was entertained is just lunacy. But, not surprised of anything coming from California. Tire companies have DEEP pockets and they will lobby against, it if it hurts their profits any. I really don't think this will stay. I say we open a tire shop on the NV border and get rich. hahahaha
Count me in…we can run a chain of stores up the state line near key areas!
 
Speaking of tires…quick question….. I got my Method 709hd wheels and called the local 4x4 shop to schedule getting my stock tires and tpms swapped over.
Got a quote of $520…..seemed very excessive to me. I was thinking possibly $300 ….. am I wrong?
 
Ya that’s pricey. Hey. I just got 709hd’s delivered today by brown santa, too!! Im gonna call Discount this week and see how much they’ll charge me. Usually $25 a tire.
 
Speaking of tires…quick question….. I got my Method 709hd wheels and called the local 4x4 shop to schedule getting my stock tires and tpms swapped over.
Got a quote of $520…..seemed very excessive to me. I was thinking possibly $300 ….. am I wrong?
Maybe, if they are planning a Road Force Balance on all 5 and ride match the wheels to the tires (rotate tires on wheels for optimum balance) and considering they also need to dismount tires. If they never heard of "Road Force Balancing" to ride match and won't guarantee an OEM ride quality then seems way excessive.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom